[BusyBox] Busybox 1.0.0-pre10 and sendmail

[Denis Vlasenko]

On Monday 10 May 2004 20:54, Michael Shearer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why Sendmail, good question.  Well, it's the defacto SMTP daemon isn't it? 
> I don't really need all it's features but apart from being a hassle to
> configure, it's stable and secure.  I'd welcome any other recommendations.

Stable?
After all the years, people find remote exploits in it from time to time.

I use qmail. My only worry is it's "not quite GPL" license.
--
vda