[BusyBox] CONFIG_ name clashing with kernel

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Mon Aug 1 20:55:43 MDT 2005


On Monday 01 August 2005 10:48 pm, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Mon Aug 01, 2005 at 10:09:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 01 August 2005 06:55 pm, Paul Fox wrote:
> > >  > >> we can rename these three defines (SYSCTL/TR/WATCHDOG) or we
> > >  > >> could take care of this now (and forever) by replacing all of the
> > >  > >> macros with a different namespace:
> > >  > >
> > >  > > BB_CONFIG_*> Let's not make the prefix longer, thanks.
> > >  >
> > >  > I agree entirely. I like the BB_ prefix though. How about
> > >  > BB_FEATURE_xxx instead? (i.e. s/CONFIG_/BB_/)
> > >
> > > this would be a _big_ change.  i know this has been hashed
> > > through, but is it really really necessary?
> >
> > i really think it is
>
> But not for busybox 1.01...

right ... i only want to do this once since i imagine it'll take a lot of 
effort :)
-mike


More information about the busybox mailing list