[BusyBox] Fiddling with df...

[Jason Schoon]

I vote for the accept and ignore idea.

On 8/17/05, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> 
> I have the cleaned up patch, but it blew up by 500 bytes over 1.01 (partly
> because df_main got bigger and partly because it's now pulling in things 
> like
> bb_xgetularg_bnd_sfx()) and I'm trying to trim it back down...
> 
> However, I'd like to ask what the -t support needed for susv3 actually
> _means_. According to the susv3 spec, it means "include total
> allocated-space figures in the output" AND that "the output format is
> unspecified when -t is used". But what the gnu version uses -t for is to
> limit df to certain filesystem types, which has NOTHING to do with that 
> the
> spec says -t should be for.
> 
> Considering that the gnu version doesn't support this, and that it's 
> flagged
> as an XSI extension, and that what exactly to do with it is undefined
> anyway...
> 
> I don't think we need to do this one. Anybody else? (Possibly accept but
> ignore -t?)
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at mail.busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
> 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20050817/d5cc2f89/attachment.htm