[BusyBox] [patch] new applet mountpoint

[Jason Schoon]

I think that would be cool. You can't change or modify the license, it must 
be distributed in its entirety. However, I don't know of a clause that says 
you must include it in any file, or that you can't simply point at the full 
text elsewhere.

On 8/18/05, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 18 August 2005 07:26 pm, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 August 2005 14:16, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Attached patch adds a mountpoint(1) applet.
> >
> > I have no strong opinion either way: it looks vaguely sane, and is an
> > applet I've never even heard of (although ubuntu has it).
> 
> yeah, ive never heard of it either, and the applet looks ok at first 
> glance
> 
> > 2) Do we really need the full boilerplate telling people that they 
> should
> > use snailmail to get a copy of the GPL, or can't we just give 2 lines 
> ala:
> > This code is licensed under the GPL v2, see the file LICENSE in this
> > tarball or http://fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html for full license text.
> 
> this has always kind of bothered me ... i like your 2 line idea a lot and
> wouldnt mind doing it to the whole of trunk ...
> -mike
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at mail.busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20050818/4f8017a1/attachment.html