[BusyBox] What does it mean when I find bugs in the standard mount?

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 14:45, Tito wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> > So I'm testing the behavior of my mount against the util-linux mount in
> > ubuntu, and guess what?  The util-linux mount goes _nuts_ in some obvious
> > corner cases.  Try this:
>
> snip
>
> > That last command umounts "ram" and "move", even though A) it wasn't
> > asked to, B) there's nothing mounted on bind.  It did this because
> > "/etc/mtab" got confused.  This is another reason to just symlink that to
> > /proc/filesystems
>
> /proc/mounts?
>
> Tito

The downside of posting at 5 am after an all-night hacking session.

Yes, obviously. :)

Rob