[BusyBox] [patch] Add bunzip2 support to insmod
Jason Schoon
floydpink at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 19:16:01 UTC 2005
Agreed, we use squashfs for our rootfilesystem to save space on everything.
However, I could see this being a useful alternative, for those who need a
writable rootfilesystem, can't/won't use unionfs.
I think the differentiation between a failed unzip and an uncompressed file
could use some work though. Although, I guess if it fails, it fails and your
system won't work as expected either way. A differentiating error code or
message might help in debugging the problem though.
On 8/16/05, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 10:41, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> Or you could use a compressed filesystem like squashfs...
>
> I personally have no strong opinion either way...
>
> Rob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at mail.busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20050816/d0491996/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the busybox
mailing list