[BusyBox] Re: newlib's libbb/printf.c [PATCH]
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Wed Jul 27 07:07:30 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:05, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 25 July 2005 02:33 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > 2005-04-05 Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > * libbb/printf.c: Check for __NEWLIB_H__ before __GLIBC__.
>
> added, thanks
> -mike
A) I don't suppose there's an easy way to centralize all the libc dependencies
into a compiler.h header file, somewhere?
B) If newlib is lying and claiming to be glibc, yet doesn't work like glibc
for something that we care about, why isn't it newlib that's broken?
C) Half this patch is whitespace noise adding spaces between the # and the
preprocessor directive (which I personally consider a regression, and would
have applied a patch to _undo_. But that's just me...)
Rob
More information about the busybox
mailing list