revision 14426 can't be built

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:35:37AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>On Thursday 02 March 2006 21:48, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:22:15PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>> >On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:33 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:03:32PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>> >> >In the fresh tree:
>> >> >
>> >> ># make allnoconfig
>> >> >/.share/usr/src2/bbox/busybox.tst/e2fsprogs/Makefile.in:72: FIXME: change
>> >> > .c to include their stuff relative to
>> >> > /.share/usr/src2/bbox/busybox.tst/e2fsprogs make: *** virtual memory
>> >> > exhausted.  Stop.
>> 
>> >It blew up so hard chunks wound up embedded in the wall.  Makefile:248 
>> >complains about every single Makefile.in in the entire tree not being found, 
>> >and then it dies.

make-3.79.1 doesn't have a MAKEFILE_LIST. Workaround installed.

NOTE: building out of tree with make-3.79.1 is *not* supported.

for building out-of-tree, users of make-3.79 still have to pass
top_srcdir= to make:
make -f /srcs/busybox/Makefile top_srcdir=/srcs/busybox



>> >
>> >I notice that line 248 is more residue of the "modules" approach, which I 
>> >asked to be separated out, and was told had been separated out.  Did I 
>> >misunderstand?
>> 
>> No, I goofed backing out all of it, which is clearly not was intended.
>> 
>> vda, Rob, can you please svn up and let me know if it is ok now resp.
>> where it freaks out now? Thanks and sorry for any inconvenience this may
>> have caused.
>
>Revision 14453 still does not work:

Revision 14455 does work for me with make-3.79.1 from redhat when
building in the source-tree.

Can somebody please confirm this?