[Patch] Add command ":wn" to vi-applet

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Thursday 23 March 2006 5:15 pm, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:42:09PM +0100, Alexander Griesser wrote:
>> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >I don't know if you want this feature in the current vi release, I think
>> >the difference in sizes with this patch applied isn't that dramatically
>> >and I really like :wn ;)
>> >
>> >OLD:
>> >   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>> >  20429       4     924   21357    536d vi.o
>> >
>> >NEW:
>> >   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>> >  20456       4     924   21384    5388 vi.o
>
>
>
>> The patch you sent doesn't apply. The *.no. variants are your patch,
>> the smaller ones (the busybox.vi-add_wn.01_02.diff) would add a byte
>> less, fwiw.
>>
>>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>> 01_02 alone:
>>   20403	      4	    924	  21331	   5353	editors/vi.o.orig-4.0
>>   20430	      4	    924	  21358	   536e	editors/vi.o.no-4.0
>>   20429	      4	    924	  21357	   536d	editors/vi.o-4.0
>>   19823	      4	    816	  20643	   50a3	editors/vi.o.orig-4.2
>>   19850	      4	    816	  20670	   50be	editors/vi.o.no-4.2
>>   19849	      4	    816	  20669	   50bd	editors/vi.o-4.2
>> both 01_02 and 02_02
>>   20393	      4	    924	  21321	   5349	editors/vi.o-4.0-svn-version
>>   19825	      4	    816	  20645	   50a5	editors/vi.o-4.2-svn-version
>
>strcasecmp() with a three byte string is turned into thirteen comparisons 
>(seven ==s, four ||s, and two &&s), but the one strcasecmp() on the next line 
>is left alone?
>
>I'm _CONFUSED_.

I don't mean to shrink vi, nor clean it up :)

>I go :w filename from time to time, is this related?

no.