svn 15150... what the?

[Rob Landley]

On Monday 22 May 2006 10:43 pm, Rich Felker wrote:
> There's an argument about whether these constitute "sane"
> environments, but proprietary unices often have a 'traditional' shell
> with broken semantics in /bin (same for the rest of the base tools)
> and the posix-compliant ones hidden away in /usr/xpg or something like
> that. :(

There are broken proprietary unixes under which BusyBox doesn't build because 
they're broken, yes.

> Rich

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.