[PATCH] one more fix for make defconfig in syslogd
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Tue Sep 12 19:57:59 UTC 2006
On Monday 11 September 2006 7:43 am, Tito wrote:
> Yes, i agree with you, but on the other side
> we cannot ship a broken build system,
> so or we fix or remove make defconfig
> or at least -Werror
> or we fix the code.
I'll probably take -Werror out for the actual 1.3.0 release (since new
versions of gcc always seem to introduce new really _STUPID_ warnings), but
introducing new warnings during development _should_ be painful.
> I personally will not touch the makefiles
> magics............
Denis Vlasenko has a rewrite of our build system based on the Linux kernel's
build system (kbuild) that I'm really looking forward to. I've glanced at
the patches but the kbuild maintainer pointed Denis at the version of kbuild
used to build klibc as a better starting point (and something the kernel
itself is likely to resync with soon, the project-specific assumptions are
broken out better). I'm waiting either for the drop based on that or for
Denis to say he's not going to do that, and Denis is off having fun elsewhere
in the tree at the moment. :)
We're already using the kernel's menuconfig, and the kernel has its own build
system and dependency generation and stuff based on that which gets way more
development effort and scrutiny than we do. Seems logical to sync with that
if we can pull it off...
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list