<br>
Hello everyone, <br>
<br>
Thanks for your replies.<br>
So now I have this CD of development tools that are supposed to work with my board and BASH is among them.<br>
I have tried to install it using the rpm command in the BusyBox v1.2.1 and this is what I get:<br>
<br>
<span style="font-style: italic;">/home/carmen # ./busybox rpm -i bash-ppc_4xx-3.0-31_1.ppc.rpm </span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">rpm: Cannot create symlink from ./bin/sh to 'bash': File exists</span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">10206 blocks</span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">rpm: unknown group name: root</span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<br style="font-style: italic;">
After this I checked the /bin directory and now there is a file called
"bash" in the directory, which when I try to run it, gives me
this error:<br>
<br>
<span style="font-style: italic;">/bin # bash </span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<span style="font-style: italic;">bash: error while loading shared libraries: libtermcap.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory</span><br style="font-style: italic;">
<br>
Any ideas as to why this is happening and how I could fix it?<br>
I apologize if I am asking some obvious questions.I am no Linux expert...<br>
<br>
thank you,<br>
Carmen<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Rob Landley <<a href="mailto:rob@landley.net">rob@landley.net</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:busybox@busybox.net">busybox@busybox.net</a><br>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:50:45 -0500<br>
Subject: Re: BASH issue<br>
On Monday 06 November 2006 6:27 pm, Paul Fox wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Hi everyone,<br>
> ><br>
> > So I am trying to build a JVM on a PPC 405EP board using BusyBox v<br>
1.2.1 .<br>
> > The config files for this JVM use bash and from what I have seen on<br>
search<br>
> > results , BusyBox does not have Bash.However, I read somewhere that there<br>
is<br>
> > a shell called BBSH that would be a smaller version of BASH. Is that true<br>
> > and if so, what features is BBSH missing and how could I get it (my<br>
current<br>
> > version of BusyBox does not have it)?<br>
><br>
> bbsh is under development still, by rob landley.<br>
<br>
No, it isn't. I'm doing a new shell for toybox, but I'm not working on the<br>
version in busybox anymore after Bruce took all the fun out of it. I'd<br>
recommend just removing the one in busybox; it's fairly useless and I'm not<br>
adding to it.<br>
<br>
Rob<br>