[uClibc] Re: bogus change to <sys/cdefs.h>?

[Miles Bader]

mjn3 at codepoet.org (Manuel Novoa III) writes:
> > Index: cdefs.h
> 
> I had to update cdefs.h when I updated several other headers.  There
> wasn't any reason for the change in question though.  I simply swapped
> in the new file and that was part of the upstream changes.

Ok.

Maybe it would be useful to have either a more formal process for
syncing with glibc (e.g., CVS's vendor-merge stuff, but that's kind of a
pain last time I tried it), or at least a list of which headers are
considered `pristine' copies of glibc (or perhaps more conveniently, a
list of which originally-copied-from-glibc headers are known _not_ to be
pristine, and so require extra care)...

> > If I don't hear any objections, I'll change it back to use
> > __C_SYMBOL_PREFIX__.
> 
> No objection here.

Cool, I'll do it.

Thanks,

-Miles
-- 
o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by
  Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.