Long release cycle (was: RE: uclibc tool chain installation problem)

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 04:17, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> A release cycle of one to two months rather than once a year
> would be much appreciated.  That way, if we incorporate a new
> version and find some problems with it, we won't have to wait
> a year to have them officially fixed...

putting trunk on such a release schedule doesnt really "solve" things imo ...

since we have svn now, doing branches/tags should be quite trivial ... i 
wouldnt mind seeing the next release, 0.9.29, created as a branch and then as 
any minor bugfixes are found, doing tags of like 0.9.29.1, 0.9.29.2, etc...

of course, i'll defer to whatever Erik sees fit ;)
-mike