udhcp and busybox
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Tue Mar 28 07:13:31 PST 2006
On Monday 27 March 2006 1:23 pm, Paul Fox wrote:
> > > > It first hit me when I was using buildroot - all of busybox worked
> > > > right after installing except udhcpc, which had the following
> > > > issues:
> > > >
> > > > * it required a script, which isn't installed by buildroot
> > >
> > > sounds like a bug in buildroot, no?
> >
> > No, it's a bug in the dhcp client for needing it. If even init can
> > avoid using /etc/inittab, there's no excuse for dhcp needing a script.
>
> as designed, it needs a config file. so buildroot needs to
> provide one. the bug is in buildroot.
Then it's a design bug. It's still a bug.
> > My objections were ignored, and now I'm making the problem
> > _GO_AWAY_. And the since only way to do that is write a new
> > one, that's what I'm doing.
>
> that's fine. for some reason i don't understand, my builds have
> not yet broken.
I'll check it in when I have something that works.
> i'm sure they will, and when they do i'll certainly
> share your pain. i agree that linking the trees is a problem.
> i'd actually prefer that busybox not include udhcp at all than to
> link the repositories like that.
My sentiments exactly, but I agree that having a dhcp client and dhcp server
are useful, so I need to add those to busybox. (Although dumpleases is
silly: if the server needs to keep a leases file updated then it should do
so. We have ramfs now so you can always have _some_ writeable space.)
> paul
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list