waiting for reply; timeout? [was: "i'll think about it"]
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Mon Sep 25 07:01:50 UTC 2006
On Sunday 24 September 2006 6:25 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> What happened to "df -t", out of curiousity?
> http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-August/015497.html
I've just spent an hour or so on this and I'm kind of curious too. The df -t
from SUSv3 and the df -t from gnu aren't on speaking terms, they do
completely different things.
In the gnu df, "-t" limits the listing to filesystems of a given type, and in
SUSv3 it's "Include total allocated-space figures in the output". Of course
in SUSv3 it's an XSI extension (which also insists that df should list the
number inodes), so I suspect the answer is "screw the spec, we're modeling
the gnu behavior instead"...
Right. (Also, if the same block device shows up in multiple places, I should
probably filter it out from the list of totals...)
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list